<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Strategy on YUNO AI Studio</title><link>https://yuno.to/categories/strategy/</link><description>Recent content in Strategy on YUNO AI Studio</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://yuno.to/categories/strategy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cost-Cutting Has a Floor. Growth Does Not.</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/cost-cutting-has-a-floor-growth-does-not/</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/cost-cutting-has-a-floor-growth-does-not/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ask a room of executives what AI will do for the business and the answers converge: lower costs, leaner operations, fewer people doing more. Efficiency is the reflex because efficiency is legible. A board can see a cost line fall. Growth is harder to point at, slower to attribute, and easier to leave for later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The reflex understates the prize. In a recent analysis, researchers at UCLA and Wharton broke firm value into its parts—revenue, expenses, valuation multiple—and ran AI&amp;rsquo;s effect through each&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;. The efficiency case held up and capped out fast. The growth case did not.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>AI Divergence Is Not Differentiation</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/ai-divergence-is-not-differentiation/</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/ai-divergence-is-not-differentiation/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;There is a piece of advice working its way through enterprise AI rollouts right now. Audit your AI for convergence with competitors&amp;rsquo;, and engineer divergence as the strategic goal. The diagnosis is right. The prescription points at the wrong target.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patrick van Esch, Yuanyuan Gina Cui, and J. Stewart Black describe what they call the Agentic Convergence Trap. Independent AI agents training on overlapping data, optimizing similar objectives at machine speed, reach near-identical decisions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Google Invented Generative AI. That Didn't Buy It the Market.</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/google-invented-generative-ai-that-didnt-buy-the-market/</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/google-invented-generative-ai-that-didnt-buy-the-market/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Google invented the architecture that powers nearly every modern large language model. In May 2025, Google searches on Safari fell for the first time in more than 20 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For two decades, Google&amp;rsquo;s research lab produced most of the technology behind the current generation of AI. The 2017 paper &lt;em&gt;Attention Is All You Need&lt;/em&gt; introduced the Transformer, the architecture behind nearly every commercial large language model&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;. Geoffrey Hinton, affiliated with Google when the foundational papers were published, was awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to machine learning. Google owns DeepMind. It runs Gemini. It had roughly $100 billion in cash on the balance sheet entering 2025. And in May of that year, Apple revealed that Google searches on Safari had fallen for the first time in more than 20 years. Alphabet&amp;rsquo;s stock dropped 7 percent the same day.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Most AI Strategy Documents Are Solving the Wrong Question</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/most-ai-strategy-documents-solve-wrong-question/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/most-ai-strategy-documents-solve-wrong-question/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most AI strategy documents written in 2026 fall into the same shape. There&amp;rsquo;s a maturity model, a list of tools, a vendor comparison, and a budget. The implicit question they answer: which AI platform should we standardize on?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question is interesting. It is not the question that determines whether the strategy works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The question that does—buried on slide 27 if it appears at all—is dependence. Specifically: how much of the company&amp;rsquo;s future capability is being routed through a single external provider, and what does the exit option look like if that provider raises prices, gets acquired, or drifts in capability?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Smaller, Specialized Models Are Better</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/smaller-specialized-models-are-better/</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/smaller-specialized-models-are-better/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In early 2023, Clément Delangue noticed a pattern in the new models being uploaded to Hugging Face&amp;rsquo;s platform. &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;What we&amp;rsquo;re seeing is that you need new models because they&amp;rsquo;re optimized for a specific domain. Smaller, more efficient, cheaper to run.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By September 2024, he was more direct: &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Contrary to the &amp;lsquo;one model to rule them all&amp;rsquo; fallacy, smaller specialized models are better.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a quiet but expensive observation. Most enterprise AI roadmaps in 2026 still center on the question, &lt;em&gt;&amp;ldquo;Which frontier model do we standardize on?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/em&gt; The companies actually shipping AI in production aren&amp;rsquo;t asking that question. They&amp;rsquo;re asking the opposite one: &lt;em&gt;which workflow needs its own model?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why the Best AI Companies Are Open</title><link>https://yuno.to/blog/why-the-best-ai-companies-are-open/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://yuno.to/blog/why-the-best-ai-companies-are-open/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;In May 2022, a small company in Paris closed a Series C round valuing it at $2 billion. The product was free. Anyone could download it. Anyone could fork it. By August 2023, the same company raised another $235 million at a $4.5 billion valuation. By August 2024, it was profitable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The company is Hugging Face. The product is open-source AI infrastructure. And the strategic principle behind its rise is one that most executives still get wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>